Wednesday 30 November 2011

The Art (and Science) of In-Class Questioning via Clickers

 
 

Sent to you by David Andrew via Google Reader:

 
 

via Learning About Teaching Physics by stephanie@sciencegeekgirl.com (Stephanie V. Chasteen) on 7/20/11

itunes pic

Are "clickers" or "personal response systems" just the latest fad in education? Or is there solid research behind their use? In this episode we share some recent studies that really highlight how clickers can be used most effectively, and how they can save the world!

 

Show notes:

Guests on today's podcast were Eric Mazur of Harvard University, Jenny Knight of University of Colorado at Boulder, and Ed Prather of the University of Arizona.

Studies cited were:

  1. Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions  Michelle Smith, William Wood, Wendy Adams, Carl Wieman, Jenny Knight, Nancy Guild, and Tin Tin Su, Science, Vol. 323 no. 5910, pp. 122-124 (2009).
  2. Combining Peer Discussion with Instructor Explanation Increases Student Learning from In-Class Concept Questions.  Michelle Smith, William Wood, K. Krauter, and Jenny Knight.  CBE - Life Sciences Education, 10, 55-63 (2011).
  3. Listening to student conversations during clicker questions:  What you have not heard might surprise you!  Mark James and Shannon Willoughby, AM. J. Phys., 79(1), 123-133 (2011).  Described here.

 

Credits

Learning About Teaching Physics is supported by a grant from the American Association of Physics Teachers (Physics Education Research Topical Group). 

Today's music was:

  • DC 3000 by the Thievery Corporation (Creative Commons)
  • Funkorama, Firmament and Rumination by Kevin McLeod
  • Sunshine by Mark Crawford
  • Sound effects by audiofruit, SFX Bible, Rebecca Parnell and SFX Source, on Soundsnap.

Other Resources

There are a wide variety of instructor resources on clicker use available at STEMclickers.colorado.edu, including videos, literature, and an instructor's guide.

Ed Prather's version of Peer Instruction is called Think Pair Share (and you can read more about it at that link).

Books include:


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

The truth behind the myth behind the truth behind learning styles (Learning ...

 
 

Sent to you by David Andrew via Google Reader:

 
 

via sciencegeekgirl.com by Stephanie Chasteen on 11/29/11

Is she a visual learner? Probably not -- or is she?

Have you heard that some people are auditory learners and some are visual learners?   Have you heard that that's bunk?  Have you heard that there might be something behind the bunk, but aren't quite sure what it is?  Listen to my latest podcast from the Learning About Teaching Physics series to hear conversations with myself, veteran HS teacher Michael Fuchs, and cognitive scientists to hear just what researchers have (and haven't) found about learning styles.

Here is the blurb for this podcast:

Are you a visual learner or an auditory learner? I bet you can tell me which you think you are. But does it matter? In this podcast, we discuss the research on individual learning styles, and how science learning requires us to blend the visual and the verbal.

Thanks to Hal Pashler of UC San Diego and Richard Mayer of UC Santa Barbara for their participation in this podcast.

Listen to the podcast on the PER User's Guide, and you can also see my previous podcasts:  The Art (and Science) of In-Class Questioning Using Clickers, and Seeing Isn't Believing:  Do students learn from in-class demonstrations?

This is a short series funded by a small grant and I've only got one more podcast to go.  Do you think I should continue?  Do you have ideas for future topics?  Ideas for grant funding?  Let me know, or else we might not make any more.

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Monday 28 November 2011

Do students read your feedback?

 
 

Sent to you by David Andrew via Google Reader:

 
 

via theteachingtomtom by theteachingtomtom on 11/22/11

Post by Kylie Budge

Image via UBC Library

When asked this question, many teachers would probably be tempted to respond "Not likely!" or "I can't see any evidence of it". Even though it may feel like students don't read our feedback on their work, take on board our comments, or value it in any way it's useful to look at what the research in this area tells us.

Most of us are probably aware that students report a great deal of dissatisfaction with the feedback they currently receive on their work. This is a sector-wide phenomenon, not one just linked to your university. A colleague and I were involved in some local research on this topic recently and discovered some interesting information (see references below). In doing this research we found that student feedback surveys in Australia and the UK report student dissatisfaction with the quantity, quality, and timing of feedback. While there has been quite a bit of research into feedback generally, until recently little was known about how students feel about the issue.

What we've been learning is this: students value feedback on their work when the timing and frequency, quantity and quality, and the form that feedback takes is considered.

Timing is critical in terms of students being able to apply the feedback in their work. Feedback early on in the semester is very important to first year students, but all students can benefit from this too.

Students are saying they want constructive, quality feedback that tells them what they need to improve on rather than just an indication of what they did right and/or wrong.

Feedback can of course be provided to students in number of forms including verbal face-to-face (teacher to individual student/teacher to group/peer); hand written (teacher to individual/teacher to group/peer); and electronic feedback (teacher to individual/teacher to group/peer). A good feedback strategy will use a combination of different methods, including peer feedback, to encourage students to seek and use feedback from a variety of different people (ie. not just the teacher). Teachers are busy people with lots of competing demands on our time. A feedback strategy with multiple components can help us provide the feedback students need for learning in a manageable way.

Interestingly, the discipline context is also important in terms of how students value and use feedback on their work. The little research that has been done in this area from the student perspective tells us that students from creative disciplines (such as art and design) value feedback highly. Students in creative disciplines are engaged in an active feedback culture (where work critiques with their peers and lecturers is common) and often producing a product (of some description) where feedback on work-in-progress is critical. They are often eager to get feedback and value it because they are also immersed in a discipline culture where it is seen as everyday practice.

This may or may not be the case with the way students see feedback in other disciplines. Research in this area is limited so time will tell us more.

What do you think? Do you have the sense that students read and apply your feedback? And what feedback strategies work for you?

Here are some useful references if you want to learn more from recent research on feedback:

Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer Learning and Assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 24 (4), December, 1999.

Budge , K. and Gopal, S. (2009). Feedback: working from the student perspective, refereed conference paper presented at Assessment in Different Dimensions, 2009 ATN Assessment Conference, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia, 19-20 November.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research. 77 (1), 81-112.

Nicol, D.J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2), 199-218.

Rowe, A.D. & Wood, L.N. (2008). Student perceptions and preferences for feedback. Asian Social Science, 4, 3, 78-88.

Rowe, A.D., Wood, L. N. & Petocz, P. (2008). Engaging students: Student preferences for feedback. 2008 HERDSA Conference Proceedings, 1-4 July 2008, Rotorua, New Zealand.



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Friday 25 November 2011

Re: Practices & Approaches for the Integration of Teaching & Research - your input please


London, November 2011

To:      All academics in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.

 

Dear Colleague,

Re:      Practices and Approaches for the Integration of Teaching and Research.

The project 'Practices and Approaches for the Integration of Teaching and Research' is funded by the National HE STEM Programme and is being led by Imperial College London. The aim of the project is to identify and disseminate practices that help academic staff manage and integrate their research and teaching roles. Outputs from the project will directly target academic staff and staff involved in the teacher training of new lecturers.

Your assistance is kindly requested in completing a short (max.10 minutes) survey on your views and experiences of the academic role
. All responses will be treated confidential and anonymous. The survey can be accessed online by clicking the link below.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/DHDSVB5

Please do not hesitate to contact either me or the Project Officer Rianne Verschoor (r.verschoor@imperial.ac.uk) if you have any questions on any aspect of the survey or project. Thank you in anticipation for your cooperation on this important study.  

Yours sincerely,

Esat Alpay

_________________________________________________________

E. Alpay PhD (Cantab) MA (Psychology of Education) CEng MIChemE MBPsS FHEA

Senior Lecturer in Engineering Education

Associate Editor - European Journal of Engineering Education

Department of Chemical Engineering

Imperial College London

Room E361 ACEX

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ

Tel:  +44 (0)20 7594 1567

Fax: +44 (0)20 7594 1070

 

http://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/e.alpay

 

 

 



David Andrew,
Head of Academic Practice
 



The Learning Institute
Queen Mary, University of London

Mile End, London E1 4NS



02078822803

02081446753

 Book an appointment with me at http://doodle.com/DavidAndrew





Thursday 17 November 2011

theteachingtomtom

theteachingtomtom: "What Changes our Teaching?
Leave a Comment Posted by theteachingtomtom on November 16, 2011
Post by: Felicity Prentice This is our second guest post by Felicity Prentice. Felicity has morphed from being a Lecturer in Health Sciences, to Primary and Secondary teacher, to Marketing in the Commercial World, to Curriculum Designer, to currently being an Educational Developer in DSC College RMIT University. Apart from her career indecisiveness, she is passionate about learning in any space."

'via Blog this'

Monday 7 November 2011

Rhizomatic Learning – Why we teach? » Dave's Educational Blog

Rhizomatic Learning – Why we teach? » Dave's Educational Blog: "Rhizomatic learning is a way of thinking about learning based on ideas described by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari in a thousand plateaus. A rhizome, sometimes called a creeping rootstalk, is a stem of a plant that sends out roots and shoots as it spreads. It is an image used by D&G to describe the way that ideas are multiple, interconnected and self-relicating. A rhizome has no beginning or end… like the learning process. I wrote my first article on the topic ‘rhizomatic education: community as curriculum’ in an article I wrote in 2008."

'via Blog this'

Fwd: STEM Annual Conference 2012: Call for papers


Dear Colleague

The Higher Education Academy's first annual learning and teaching STEM conference will take place on 12 and 13 April 2012 at Imperial College London, one of the world's leading centres of excellence for teaching and research in the fields of science, technology and medicine.

STEM subjects are recognised as having strategic importance in higher education for the economy and employers. The student learning experience in STEM subjects is vital in ensuring sustained growth in the uptake of these key disciplines. Furthermore an excellent learning experience ensures that students developed the right skills at the time of graduation and beyond through continued professional development. The Higher Education Academy (HEA)provides national leadership in developing and disseminating evidence-informed practice in learning and teaching in higher education; this conference will provide a platform for this for the HEA's STEM disciplines.

The HEA's STEM group includes the following disciplines;

"       Biological Sciences;
"       Built Environment;
"       Computing;
"       Engineering;
"       Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences;
"       Mathematics, Statistics and Operational Research;
"       Physical Sciences;
"       Psychology.
(See end for a comprehensive list of STEM subjects from which we welcome submissions)

The key conference themes applied to STEM disciplines are:

"       innovative practice in STEM learning and teaching;
"       gender issues in STEM subjects;
"       Mathematics and Statistics in an interdisciplinary context;
"       work-based learning in STEM subjects;
"       teaching and assessing large classes;
"       assessment and feedback;
"       employability;
"       flexible learning;
"       internationalisation;
"       retention and success.

We are interested in papers that apply to specific STEM disciplines as well as generically, across all STEM subjects.

Abstracts of up to 300 words should be submitted by Friday 16 December 2011 and are subjected to double-blinded peer review; a response will be sent by 16 January 2012. If an abstract is accepted for the conference, a full draft paper should be submitted by Friday 17 February 2012.  Full paper submissions and authors will have reviewers' comments by 2 March 2012.  Camera-ready papers should be returned to the conference committee by 16 March 2012 for inclusion in the proceedings.

The session submission form and guidelines can be found here:
http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/events/detail/2012/academyevents/STEM_annual_conf

STEM SUBJECTS
Biology, Zoology, Genetics, Microbiology, Molecular Biology, Biophysics and Biochemistry, Others in Biological Sciences, Psychology, Forestry, Food and Beverage studies, Agriculture, Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, Forensic and Archaeological Science, Geology, Ocean Sciences, Others in Physical Sciences, Human Geography, Physical Geography and Environmental Science, Mathematics and Statistics, Operational Research, Computer Science, General Engineering, Mechanical, Production and Manufacturing Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Naval Architecture, Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical, Process and Energy Engineering, Others in Engineering,  Materials and Minerals Technology, Maritime Technology, Others in Technology, Architecture, Building, Landscape Design, Planning (Urban, Rural and Regional), Others in Architecture, Building and Planning.

Best wishes
Paul

Paul Yates
Discipline Lead for the Physical Sciences The Higher Education Academy Innovation Way York Science Park Heslington York YO10 5BR

Email: paul.yates@heacademy.ac.uk
Telephone: +44(0)7776 197472
Skype: HEApaulyates




David Andrew,
Head of Academic Practice
 



The Learning Institute at Queen Mary, University of London

Mile End, London E1 4NS



02078822803

02081446753

 Book an appointment with me at http://doodle.com/DavidAndrew





Thursday 3 November 2011

Fwd: STEM Annual Conference 2012: Call for papers



Dear Colleague

The Higher Education Academy's first annual learning and teaching STEM conference will take place on 12 and 13 April 2012 at Imperial College London, one of the world's leading centres of excellence for teaching and research in the fields of science, technology and medicine.

STEM subjects are recognised as having strategic importance in higher education for the economy and employers. The student learning experience in STEM subjects is vital in ensuring sustained growth in the uptake of these key disciplines. Furthermore an excellent learning experience ensures that students developed the right skills at the time of graduation and beyond through continued professional development. The Higher Education Academy (HEA)provides national leadership in developing and disseminating evidence-informed practice in learning and teaching in higher education; this conference will provide a platform for this for the HEA's STEM disciplines.

The HEA's STEM group includes the following disciplines;

"       Biological Sciences;
"       Built Environment;
"       Computing;
"       Engineering;
"       Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences;
"       Mathematics, Statistics and Operational Research;
"       Physical Sciences;
"       Psychology.
(See end for a comprehensive list of STEM subjects from which we welcome submissions)

The key conference themes applied to STEM disciplines are:

"       innovative practice in STEM learning and teaching;
"       gender issues in STEM subjects;
"       Mathematics and Statistics in an interdisciplinary context;
"       work-based learning in STEM subjects;
"       teaching and assessing large classes;
"       assessment and feedback;
"       employability;
"       flexible learning;
"       internationalisation;
"       retention and success.

We are interested in papers that apply to specific STEM disciplines as well as generically, across all STEM subjects.

Abstracts of up to 300 words should be submitted by Friday 16 December 2011 and are subjected to double-blinded peer review; a response will be sent by 16 January 2012. If an abstract is accepted for the conference, a full draft paper should be submitted by Friday 17 February 2012.  Full paper submissions and authors will have reviewers' comments by 2 March 2012.  Camera-ready papers should be returned to the conference committee by 16 March 2012 for inclusion in the proceedings.

The session submission form and guidelines can be found here:
http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/events/detail/2012/academyevents/STEM_annual_conf

STEM SUBJECTS
Biology, Zoology, Genetics, Microbiology, Molecular Biology, Biophysics and Biochemistry, Others in Biological Sciences, Psychology, Forestry, Food and Beverage studies, Agriculture, Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, Forensic and Archaeological Science, Geology, Ocean Sciences, Others in Physical Sciences, Physical Geography and  Environmental Science, Mathematics and Statistics, Operational Research, Computer Science, General Engineering, Mechanical, Production and Manufacturing Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Naval Architecture, Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical, Process and Energy Engineering, Others in Engineering,  Materials and Minerals Technology, Maritime Technology, Others in Technology, Architecture, Building, Landscape Design, Planning (Urban, Rural and Regional), Others in Architecture, Building and Planning.

Best regards

Mary

Dr Mary McAlinden
Discipline Lead for Mathematics, Statistics & Operational Research
The Higher Education Academy

Email: mary.mcalinden@heacademy.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)7720 968849
www.heacademy.ac.uk



David Andrew,
Head of Academic Practice
 



The Learning Institute at Queen Mary, University of London

Mile End, London E1 4NS



02078822803

02081446753

 Book an appointment with me at http://doodle.com/DavidAndrew