Tuesday, 5 July 2011

Light the blue touch paper...


via Byline

Should teachers try to create order from chaos? Or should we try to achieve the opposite - turning order into chaos? Let me explain. The human mind naturally and subconsciously seeks order, pattern, closure - the Gestalt psychology experiments of Max Wertheimer, Kurt Koffka and Wolfgang Kohler from the previous century has established that. We are oh so comfortable with order and predictability. We know what is coming next, we can control it, and it doesn't tax our minds that much. But for today's schools and universities, where we should be trying to 'draw out from within', surely order and predictability run counter to creative learning and self-driven critical enquiry. Shouldn't we be taking learners outside their comfort zones? For far too long, schools have been providing learners with definitive answers to sterile questions, and there is usually only one answer. Yet we can do so much more by encouraging students to question for themselves. We would see a great deal more evidence of critical thinking if we taught students to question more and answer less. One of my colleagues once said that he preferred to send his students out of the classroom confused. That way, they would be more likely to resolve their own cognitive dissonance by going off and doing some personal research to see if they could resolve their own confusion.

So should be try to achieve chaos from order? Should we attempt to subvert the ordered, linear curricula that we are commanded and expected to deliver? Should teachers try to create uncertain, and dare I say it - dangerous - environments within which students can question and argue? Do we need anarchy in the school system? Sugata Mitra, who is famous for his Hole in the Wall experiments, believes in what he calls minimally invasive education, where students can use tools to find out for themselves. He argues that all the answers are already there on the web for learners to discover for themselves. The new roles of teachers are to ask timely and relevant questions - searching ones that will stretch students and cause them to research for themselves. For a long time problem based learning has been a mainstay of the training of medical students. Present the students with a problem, and they will need to find a solution to resolve the dissonance. Along with many others, I have taken this a step farther by presenting my students with ill-structured problems. These are problems that have very few parameters and very little information. Students are forced to 'fill in the gaps' usually drawing on previous knowledge, before they can find their own personal solutions to the problem. Moreover, there are many possible solutions to ill-structured problems.

Such problem based learning takes a little time, and with the addition of a shared discussion space, develops over time, but the understanding of the topic is ultimately far deeper than if students were served up the answers on a plate. Maurice Holt provides an excellent argument for 'slower education' in his blog post Fresh Thinking about Schooling, and I quote:

"Since education is essentially about equipping our children with the ability to act responsibly in a complex society, the idea of a Slow School follows very readily from the metaphor of Slow. It brings to mind an institution where students have time to discuss, argue, and reflect upon knowledge and ideas, and so come to understand themselves and the culture they will inherit."


Much of the power of setting ill-structured problems for students is that they can post their solutions (and the reasoning behind them) onto shared online spaces such as wikis, where they will then have the task to defend their solution against criticism from the rest of the group. Students also have licence to attack the solutions of their peers. Learners need to think on their feet against all comers, and of course they learn by synthesising the best elements from other people's solutions. So, light the blue touch paper, stand back, and let the chaos commence....


Image source by Christopher Hubenthal

Creative Commons Licence
Light the blue touch paper... by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Posted by Steve Wheeler from Learning with e's



David Andrew
Sent from my iPod

Monday, 27 June 2011

nht~~我教你如何透過網路賺錢~~bbu

d我v們劖創僌造c出
呕 p 僁月c收呋入劁3i0仭萬v以剶上i超仢過吶百o位
傢 c 含月o收傗入仍8u萬剗以i上仃超u過剌千傂位
b 同 o手偸動b輸吁入
刷 h 亣oun刭9h.亙t召on/偘kbs叢cdfv/
劖 僌

Wednesday, 18 May 2011

Emailing message from @NatureChemistry (via HootSuite iPhone)

@NatureChemistry: RT @ChemConnector: Why have chemistry software on mobile devices?: http://t.co/E0HYmiL

OriginalMessage:
http://twitter.com/NatureChemistry/status/70759540450275328

Sent from HootSuite iPhone
http://hootsuite.com/iphone


David Andrew
Sent from my iPod

Monday, 16 May 2011

Get the word out: Effective communication of physics education research

 
 

Sent to you by David Andrew via Google Reader:

 
 

via sciencegeekgirl.com by sciencegeekgirl on 16/05/11

I recently gave a plenary talk at the Foundation and Frontiers of Physics Education Research – Puget Sound conference.  What an honor!  And very fun, because I got to talk about anything that I wanted to.  I've been wanting — for ages — to talk about the intersections that I see between science journalism and our struggle, in education research, to get instructors to use our research-based techniques.  Before coming into physics education research (PER), I was a science journalist and communicator — I've got a wide variety of publication in the popular press, and had a wonderful summer at NPR's science desk. So, at FFPERPS, I decided to finally give the talk that's been four years in coming:  Getting the word out, Effective Communication of Our Work in PER.

(I would love to give this talk again, so if anybody has an audience of faculty professional development people, please let me know, as I want to get this message across!)

The talk was incredibly well-received, generating a lot of interest and discussion and debate.  So, while it's hard to give as good of a performance to my computer, I wanted to document the presentation here on the blog.  It's 50 minutes long, so a bit of a time investment, but if you're thinking about communicating about education research, I suggest you give it a viewing.  I've got some good research studies in there, connections to the communication of climate change and anti-smoking campaigns, and great clips from NPR.

Here is the presentation in its entirety (video with my audio)

But the resolution isn't that great, so I recommend you actually just download it from my website:  Here it is (100 MB).

Here are the slides-only via Slideshare:

 

And here is the closing slide with my main points:

Thoughts?

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

"I'm sorry to have to tell you this...."

 
 

Sent to you by David Andrew via Google Reader:

 
 

via Wishful thinking in medical education by noreply@blogger.com (Anne Marie) on 15/05/11

Empathy picture
Empathy by The Shopping Sherpa


Another Sunday morning, another stimulating conversation about medical education on Twitter.
It started with a tweet from Dr. Jonathon Tomlinson "To say you cannot learn insight and empathy is like saying you cannot learn science or a new language. Possibly true, but very sad."

So can we teach empathy? What do we mean by empathy? A good review of the complexities was published earlier this year by some researchers from the University of East Anglia. They suggest that we might be better to step away from the concept of empathy and instead just focus on etiquette. It's a provocative read.

I wonder if teaching empathy isn't like teaching clinical reasoning. We need to first think of empathy as a disposition before concentrating on the skills. The following quote comes from a just-published study on how physicians think about clinical reasoning in students, is it an ability or a disposition? : "The ability-disposition distinction highlights the difference between teaching knowledge and skills, referred to as teaching-as-transmission, versus teaching attitudes, modifying personality and changing behaviour, referred to as teaching-as-enculturation."

So how can we transmit what we think is important to others about empathy? A few years ago,  I blogged about a communication skills session that I was teaching. I was aware of how this session on "breaking bad news" had to some become formulaic. But an interesting discussion did occur and we all questioned our thoughts and approaches to the topic.

Just as Krupat et. al suggest that in order to develop clinical reasoning we need to focus on  "encouraging self-awareness and mindfulness, modelling open discussion and inquiry, accepting doubt and uncertainty", I'd suggest that the same is true of developing empathy.
What we do not want is for students to leave thinking that empathy is just a set of behaviours. As this doctor tweeted: ""Empathy by rote" is a ridiculous concept. It's like teaching somebody to be "happy". Faked empathy is insulting."

Another doctor replied that to his mind one of the worst examples of this was: " to score on 'empathy' student said 'sorry it has to be me to tell you this'". The doctor was shocked as he saw this as the student putting "professional discomfort before patient distress". It's this kind of situation that we exactly need to tease out when talking to students about empathy and communication.

In a comment on a blog post by a doctor about breaking bad news, a patient writes of her feeling when she was told she had a serious condition. She explains how the doctor "As he spoke, he began to sip little bits of air in between his lips. This suggested to me he was feeling emotions as well. It made him more human and incredibly compassionate. I loved him for that."

For some patients showing that we are human and have emotions to will be right. For others it might be seen selfish. They might want us to have 'professional distance', to just get on with the job. How with someone that we don't know well can we figure out how to be? Do we have to accept that sometimes we will just get it wrong and that etiquette is the best we can aim for?

I don't expect to reach the answers to those questions through this blog. But they are the kind of issues we should discuss with students when we are in real-life situations, so that we can help them to start developing their sensitivity to communication and their inclination to becoming good communicators.

More tweets can be seen in the storify here.
Regina Holliday tells the powerful story of a doctor who seems to lack all empathy here.
Excellent post on empathy by oncologist, Robert Miller, here.
Previous posts on medical students' thoughts about teaching and learning about empathy:
A medical student's thoughts on empathy and #meded
A twitter conversation with UK medical students about empathy




 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Monday, 9 May 2011

Wiki in Resident Education

 
 

Sent to you by David Andrew via Google Reader:

 
 

via Dr Shock MD PhD by Dr Shock on 08/05/11

WIKI

Recently updated the external web page for our residency training for psychiatry. It's in Dutch and still rather dull. There's also a website for residents of psychiatry on the intra net. It's even duller. Mostly outdated documents. Wouldn't a Wiki be an alternative instead for a static web page?

Advantages of a Wiki

  • It can combine several heterogeneous systems such as documents, files, videos etc. etc.
  • Editing can be delegated to the participants in this case residents in training
  • Information can be updated easily by the different participants instead of one editor

A disadvantage could be improper editing or using the wiki for purposes not intended.

What could possibly be published on a Wiki for residency training in Psychiatry?

Using a wiki for resident education has been tried and researched. The authors from a recent publication on the results of using a wiki in education for radiology residents needed a wiki with the following features

ability to leverage existing authentication mechanisms, support diverse content including file attachments and images, provide easy organization, be readily searchable, allow quick tracking of recent changes, provide a flexible structure for granting editing permission, and require minimal administrative oversight

They found it as Dokuwiki. It was easily implemented. They also designed a survey to assess the effect of the wiki on the residency program. Fifty-one out of 60 residents responded to the survey (85%).

On average, residents thought the wiki was very useful (4.7± 0.5; Likert scale, 5 being very useful).

Residents used the wiki for looking up phone numbers, dictation templates, rotation information, educational content, schedules and others. These answers on the survey could be compared to log files on the server. The success was mostly explained by listening to the residents.

During the early days of our wiki, there was a push from the chief residents to include what was expected to be high-yield content including rotation and call schedules, phone number listings, and general on-call help.

Chief residents were the most important in maintaining the wiki. In 3 years there was no malicious editing on the wiki.

Finally, the human and hardware costs associated with implementing the wiki have been low, including 18 h of server setup and use of inexpensive server hardware.

So money can't be an argument against implementing such a wiki.
ResearchBlogging.org
Kohli, M., & Bradshaw, J. (2010). What is a Wiki, and How Can it be Used in Resident Education? Journal of Digital Imaging, 24 (1), 170-175 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-010-9292-7

 

No related posts.


 
 

Things you can do from here: